Back to
Election Home Page
  		ALBERTA ELECTION QUESTIONNAIRE 2004
COMMENTS GUIDE

Evaluation Terms Explained
  • Pro-life -candidate has answered questions pro-life (some may have a few exceptions) or has pro-life record.
  • Pro-abortion - information is sufficient to state the candidate supports the provision of abortion services under many circumstances.
  • Refused to respond - candidate definitely received questionnaire, was contacted a few times in person or by phone.
     
  • Not pro-life - gave some pro-life answers but other answers or other information make it clear that candidate is not pro-life, even if he considers himself to be.

  • 2001 - Refers to CLC' evaluation of the same person during the 2001 Aberta election.
It should be noted that our comments about a given candidate in the "candidate summary" column may differ from the candidate's self-description. Our classification is ultimately based on the candidate's record, and where he stands politically - not on his "private views" or "personal opinions."

[ go election home]

Published by LifeSite.
Permission granted for reproduction.