Politics
Wednesday May 1, 2002
See today's LifeSiteNews stories
HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL RULING SETS PRECEDENT THREATENING FREEDOM OF PRESS
Injured feelings of "vulnerable groups" used to define discrimination, rather than intent or facts of story
EDMONTON, May 1, 2002 (LSN.ca) - The Edmonton-based Report Newsmagazine has lost a key media-freedom case before a tribunal of the Alberta Human Rights and Citizenship Commission. In Kane v. Alberta Report, the tribunal determines which parts of a news story are newsworthy and which are not; it "strongly suggests" that the magazine's staff submit to human rights training by the commission; and it warns that henceforth findings of discrimination will be based on the injured feelings of "vulnerable groups," not on the intent of a publisher nor on the facts of a story.
Report Newsmagazine's pro-life editor and publisher Link Byfield is concerned that the ruling will set a precedent threatening freedom of the press. Moreover, the well known bias of human rights commissions in Canada to favour homosexual activists has led observers to suggest that the homosexual issue will be the next application of the precedent set in the ruling against Report Newsmagazine. Human Rights Tribunal decisions in Canada have already ordered Christian mayors fined up to $10,000 for failing to proclaim "Gay Pride Day" and a Christian printer being fined $5,000 for refusing to print homosexual propaganda and being ordered to print such material in the future. The many centuries old moral beliefs of the Christians involved were disregarded in favour of the more politically correct complainants' intolerance of those beliefs.
The complaint against Report arose over a short story published by Alberta Report Oct. 13, 1997. Kane objected to a description of a Jewish businessman, which he felt to be an anti-Semitic caricature, and to a comment that North American commercial real estate is dominated by Jewish families who sometimes deal preferentially with each other.
Report editor and publisher Link Byfield refused to apologize, saying the so-called "caricature" was not recognizably Jewish, that the real estate comment was simply true and not anti-Semitic, and that there was no anti-Jewish intent in the story and no anti-Jewish effect. Moreover, Byfield argued, even if there were, the Human Rights Act in Section 2(2) allows for free expression of opinion on any matter.
See the Report Press release which includes a link to the complete Human Rights ruling:
http://207.216.246.197/press/pr020501.html
Back to TopSHARE THIS STORY: E-mail Print Newsvine Digg Reddit Del.icio.us Facebook
Latest Headlines
- California Supreme Court Imposes Homosexual 'Marriage' on State
- Priests for Life Canada Selects Fr. Thomas Lynch as New National Director
- Pro-Abortion Liberal Introduces Bill to Counter Unborn Victims of Crime Bill
- Human Rights Complaint Forces College to Permit Pro-Life Group Official Club Status
- Internet Expertise to Save You Time and Money
- Want to Avoid Arthritis? Breastfeed, Have More Children and Don't Take the Pill
- Human Rights Commission Bans Prayer in City Hall of Quebec's City of Saguenay
- Pro-Life Veteran Linda Gibbons Arrested Again Outside Toronto Abortion Mill
- First UN Treaty Including "Sexual and Reproductive Health" Enters into Force
- On the Pro-Life Victory in Brazil: "I have Never Seen This Happen in the National Congress!"
- Spare Embryos Must be Destroyed: Texas Nurse Loses Last Supreme Court Petition
Most Read this Week
- Texas Pastor Connected with Prominent Gay Porn Website
- Texas Pastor Resigns After Involvement in Gay Porn Site Exposed
- Archbishop Publicly Tells Pro-Abortion Kansas Governor Not to Receive Communion
- Archbishop: For the Clergy Obedience to Church "Requires Preaching About the Moral Evil of Contraception"
- Even the Leaders Think the Homosexual Activist Movement in Canada is Going Too Far
- Christian Ministry to Disabled Drops its Code of Conduct Under Human Rights Tribunal Pressure
- California Supreme Court Imposes Homosexual 'Marriage' on State
- Time Magazine: "Want to wreck the environment? Have a baby." - Prince Philip Concurs
- More and More Seeing that "The Pill Kills"
- Pope Reminds Spouses of their "Responsibility To Generate New Children"
MORE NEWS: 
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page Last 10 Days Archives Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any Internet re-publishing of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews that have come from other news sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.