Wednesday August 16, 2006


Brits Empower Secret Courts to Decide Life and Death in Living Wills
Makes doctors liable to criminal prosecution, should they refuse to kill patients in accordance with a “living will”
By Peter J. Smith
LONDON, August 16, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - British ministers decided Monday that new courts established to arbitrate life and death for patients in cases involving “living wills” and “powers of attorney” will have license to conduct their proceedings in secret away from public scrutiny, according to a report in the Daily Mail. According to the Mail, the new Court of Protection mandated by the Mental Capacity Act of 2005 “will be the first legal tribunal in Britain to hold life-and-death powers since the abolition of the death penalty for murder in 1965.”
Under rules outlined in a “consultation paper“ by Lord Falconer, the new Court of Protection will have authority to convene in secret to adjudicate cases disputing advance decisions to refuse or withdraw treatment for incapacitated hospital patients contained in “living wills” or “powers of attorney”.
The rules state that a judge may carry on proceedings in secret if publicity would defeat the object of the hearing; if confidential information is involved; if a private hearing would protect the interests of the patient; or if the judge “considers this to be necessary in the interests of justice.”
“The court may order that identities of people involved in a case are not disclosed if it is considered necessary to protect their interests,” adds Falconer. Furthermore, he acknowledges, “The circumstances under which the court may consider that all or part of a hearing should be heard in private are wide.”
However, under the MCA, a patient’s advance directive or “living will” to refuse or withdraw life-preserving treatment does not necessarily need to have an establishment in writing. In fact, a patient’s verbal communiqué of his wishes suffices as an advance directive or “living will”, even if the incapacitated patient left a written directive to the contrary. In cases such as these, the Court of Protections will decide whether a patient lives or dies.
Critics point out that while the MCA opened up a chaotic situation in the first place where anyone may claim a patient gave them a verbal “living will” to forgo life-preserving treatment, its inherent problems are only exacerbated by granting the court the power to euthanize patients.
“It will allow the courts to do anything and everything and nobody will ever find out,” decried Robert Whelan of the Civitas think tank. “It reminds me of the Abortion Act - it was supposed to have a very limited effect but when things turned out otherwise it was too late to do anything about it. We won't know what is going on in these courts.”
Furthermore, the MCA makes doctors liable to criminal prosecution, should they refuse to kill their patients in accordance with a “living will” which the Court establishes as existing and valid.
The rules for the new Court of Protection set out in Lord Falconer’s “consultation paper” will go into effect on the authority of Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips concurrently with the Mental Capacity Act going into operation next April. The new Court of Protection’s leading judge will be Sir Mark Potter, President of the Family Division.
SHARE THIS STORY:
E-mail
Print
Newsvine
Digg
Reddit
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Latest Headlines
- IKEA’s Polish Catalogue Introduces “Ian and Steve” as a Model of the New Family

- Abortion Increases Women's Mental Health Problems: New Study

- EU Rejects Patent that “Necessarily Involves the Use and Destruction of Human Embryos”

- South Korean Court Orders Removal of Life Support from Comatose Woman

- Abortion Now Number One Cause of Death in Spain

- Series on US Election Message to Bishops Concludes With Part IV

- UK Catholic Adoption Agencies Voluntarily Refuse Religious Opt-Out Clause for Homosexual Adoption

- Final Comment on Broken Window Series

- High-ranking Political Science Profs Say U of C "Overreacted" To Pro-Life Demonstrators

- A Painful, Disease-Ridden Death Isn’t So Bad if You’re Just a White, Heterosexual Male

- Ad Showing Woman Seducing Santa Promotes Free Morning-After Pills and Condoms for Christmas

- Czech Cabinet Approves Bill Enabling "Abortion Tourism"

Most Read this Week
- Behind the Scenes of Volition: Coincidences and Startling Circumstances
- Barack Obama Consulted Repeatedly with Homosexual Anglican Bishop
- Ad Showing Woman Seducing Santa Promotes Free Morning-After Pills and Condoms for Christmas
- Belgian Couple Sells Baby on EBay
- Leading Canadian Pro-Life MP Relates Shocking 20 Year Lack of Support From Catholic Clergy
- Cardinal on Biblical Condemnation of Homosexuality: We're Not Allowed the Cowardice of "Politically Correct" Silence
- Naming the Anti-Life Appointments in the Obama Administration
- Film Review: Volition
- A Painful, Disease-Ridden Death Isn’t So Bad if You’re Just a White, Heterosexual Male
- Just In Time for Christmas - Gift Cards for Abortions from Planned Parenthood
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


Back to Top