Politics
Monday June 19, 2006
See today's LifeSiteNews stories
Supreme Court to Expand Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Review
By John Jalsevac
WASHINGTON, D.C., June 19, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Supreme Court is set to revisit a second Bush Administration appeal that seeks to reinstate a ban on partial birth abortion, reports the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ).
The ACLJ, which specializes in constitutional law, said it is pleased the Supreme Court has decided to hear the case, which involves the constitutionality of the national ban on partial-birth abortion.
“The Supreme Court took a significant step today that clearly puts the issue of partial-birth abortion front-and-center,” said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ, which litigates pro-life issues. “By taking a second case involving the constitutionality of the national ban on partial-birth abortion, the Supreme Court puts the spotlight on one of the most horrific medical procedures in existence today. The high court not only will determine whether Congress acted appropriately in enacting the ban, but the high court also has a critical opportunity to bring to an end – once and for all – the barbaric practice of partial-birth abortion. Taking a second case clearly elevates one of the most culturally significant issues of our time. The stakes are high and we are very pleased that the Supreme Court now has two opportunities to abolish what can only be described as infanticide.”
In 2000, five justices of the Supreme Court, including retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, ruled that the abortion right originally created in Roe v. Wade allows an abortionist to perform a partial-birth abortion any time he sees a 'health' benefit, even if the woman and her unborn baby are entirely healthy. (Stenberg v. Carhart, June 28, 2000). This ruling struck down the ban on partial-birth abortion that had been enacted by Nebraska, and rendered unenforceable the similar bans that more than half the states had enacted.
Nevertheless, in 2003 Congress approved and President Bush signed a national law, the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. When he signed the ban, the President called partial-birth abortion "a terrible form of violence [that] has been directed against children who are inches from birth." The federal law has faced legal challenges in three different federal circuits, and its enforcement has been blocked by court orders. Federal district courts in all three circuits ruled that the federal law violated the 2000 Supreme Court ruling. In all three cases the adverse judgments were affirmed by the appellate courts.
The ACLJ has filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court representing 78 members of Congress and more than 320,000 Americans asking the high court to uphold the constitutionality of the national ban on partial-birth abortion in a case out of Nebraska.
In its brief filed in the Nebraska case, the ACLJ asserts: “Partial birth procedures represent the beachhead of this assault on postnatal life, the bridge between abortion and infanticide. Absent strong legal barriers and vigorous societal condemnation, partial birth procedures open the way to legal infanticide.”
Back to TopSHARE THIS STORY: E-mail Print Newsvine Digg Reddit Del.icio.us Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Lithuanian Government Bans EU Pro-Homosexual Tour Truck
- Promote Culture of Life and Catholic Teaching to Combat Rising Crime and Cultural Degradation: Lancaster Bishop
- Australian Woman Dies from Taking Birth Control Pill
- Is it True McCain "Got the Message" About not Running a Pro-Abortion VP?
- Freedom of Conscience for Ontario Doctors: Public Comment Extended to September 12
- Success with Re-growing Horse Ligaments Leads to New NIH Adult Stem Cell Centre
- Guatemalan Cardinal on Abortion: "It is just as serious to kill a 10 year-old child"
- MP Ken Epp responds to the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada's Claims about Unborn Victims of Crime Bill
- Health Minister: Safe-Injection Sites a "Surrender to a Culture of Disease and Death."
- Indiana County Commission Upholds Regulations on Abortions under Criticism
- Statistics Canada Finds More Abstinence among Teen Girls in the Last Decade
- Exclusive: Retiring UK Bishop Reveals No Consensus among Brother Bishops over Same-sex Adoption
- California Supreme Court Rules Doctors Must Provide Treatment against Their Religious Beliefs
Most Read this Week
- Westminster Exorcist: Promiscuity can Lead to Demonic Possession
- Secret Meeting to Plot Global Abortion Strategy Exposed - UN Personnel Present
- Batman The Dark Knight - Should We Fear Imitation of the Joker?
- Massive Brazilian Vaccination Raises Suspicions of Covert Sterilization Program
- Niece of Martin Luther King Jr. to Lead Prayer Vigil Outside Largest U.S. Abortion Centre - Monday August 25
- Obama Caught Red-Handed in Abortion Lie
- New England Journal of Medicine: 'Brain Death' is not Death - Organ Donors are Alive
- HPV Vaccine Causes 21 Deaths and Counting - CDC Study Launched
- Traditional Fort Worth Episcopal Priests Seek Communion with Catholic Church
- Homeschooling Showdown in Brazil: Children to be Tested by Court in Battle Over Educational Rights of Parents
MORE NEWS: 
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page Last 10 Days Archives Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.