Politics
Thursday August 16, 2007
See today's LifeSiteNews stories
Abortion Pill not 'Safe' Despite Media Spin - Study Suggests Pill as Dangerous As Surgical Abortion
Misleading conclusions are being drawn about the safety of RU486
WASHINGTON, August 16, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Misleading conclusions are being drawn in news stories based on a study that has indicated that the RU486 abortion drug is no more dangerous than surgical abortions. Misleading major media headlines include: Time magazine’s “Study Finds Abortion Pill Safe,” the Chicago Tribune’s “Study: Abortion Pill Doesn’t Increase Risks” and the New York Post’s “Abortion Pill Gets all Clear.”
"Reporters are drawing the erroneous conclusion that this study means RU486 is completely safe. That's not what the study says, and nothing could be further from the truth," said Operation Rescue Senior Policy Advisor Cheryl Sullenger. "Women are dying at an alarming rate from RU486 abortions and its widespread misuse in the abortion industry. That has not changed."
The study indicates that future pregnancies are equally affected by RU486 abortions and surgical abortions. However, it is a leap in logic to say that either are safe when the study simply shows that the risks to future pregnancies of both abortion methods are equal.
The study published today in the New England Journal of Medicine concludes its abstract by underlining that the risks of medical abortion are considered in comparison with the risks of surgical abortion. It states, “We found no evidence that a previous medical abortion, as compared with a previous surgical abortion, increases the risk of spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy, preterm birth, or low birth weight.” (See the abstract online here: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/7/648).
"Women who have had abortions have greater risks of miscarriage and infertility than women who have not had abortions. It is no accident that the study refused to compare these two groups of women, because we know they would have found that abortion hurts women, and that is obviously a conclusion that they did not want to reach," said Sullenger.
RU486 is a drug approved for abortions in pregnancies under six weeks. Three office visits are usually required for this kind of abortion. Some reports indicate that RU486 has a 15% failure rate, meaning that many women who receive the drug must also have a surgical abortion to completely remove the pre-born baby and other pregnancy tissue.
"Women aborting with RU486 can pass their babies anywhere. This has created a lot of emotional trauma for women who do not expect to come face to face with a tiny baby complete with arms, legs and a recognizable face," said Sullenger.
"The reputation of RU486 has suffered recently because of the publicity generated by a number of abortion deaths related to the drug. The media distortion we are seeing is a simple case of public relations damage control," said Sullenger. "Hiding the possibility of RU486's life-threatening dangers from women really shows that there is more concern for selling abortions than for protecting and informing women. This misinformation campaign is really a horrific thing when you think about it that could needlessly cost women's lives."
Back to TopSHARE THIS STORY: E-mail Print Newsvine Digg Reddit Del.icio.us Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Abortion-Politician-Communion Scandal Shows Real Lack of Pastoral Concern - Editorial
- "Women Should Have the Right to Choose" says Head of UK Parliamentary Pro-Life Group
- British MPs Defeat all Pro-Life Provisions in the HFE Bill
- No Comment from Bishops as Cherie, wife of Former PM Blair, Touts Catholicism While Extolling Contraception
- Land of Anne of Green Gables, Prince Edward Island, Re-writes Laws To Recognize Same-Sex Marriage
- Archbishop Chaput to Obama Catholics: If You're Serious Catholics, You'll Be Serious About Making Your Candidate Pro-Life, Not Editing My Words
- US Court Rules Banning Partial Birth Abortions Performed "By Accident" Are Unconstitutional
- F.D.A. Delays Human Trials of Embyonic Stem Cell Research Treatment
- Abortion Most Prevalent Among Women Aged 20 to 24 – Statistics Canada
Most Read this Week
- Late Term Aborted Babies in UK Left to "Gasp for Breath" Until Death
- Governor Schwarzenegger Vows to Fight Reinstatement of Traditional Marriage
- Pro-Life Movement Offers Sen. Kennedy Prayers and Forgiveness as He Faces Potentially Fatal Brain Tumor
- California Supreme Court Imposes Homosexual 'Marriage' on State
- Anglican Acceptance of both Abortion and Sanctity of Life will Allow the Creation of a Gay Church: Gene Robinson
- State Funded Homosexual Youth Event Encourages Children to Display Homosexual Acts
- Ontario Forces Taxpayers to Pay for “Sex-Change” Operations
- Pro-Abortion Expression Permitted, Pro-Life Forbidden on Campus at Australia University
- California Supreme Court Asked to Stay "Gay Marriage" Order until November Public Ballot
- Letters to the Editor for May 16th, 2008
MORE NEWS: 
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page Last 10 Days Archives Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any Internet re-publishing of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews that have come from other news sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.