Wednesday January 31, 2007


Evidence of Media Bias: Big Three Networks Ignore March for Life but not 'Peace Surge'
Reproduced with Permission of the Media Research Center
By Tim Graham, the MRC's Director of Media Analysis
Photos (all of different sections of March for Life crowd) - Steve Jalsevac, LifeSiteNews.com
Obviously, the networks believe some demonstrators are more newsworthy than others. It might just depend on whether the cause is liberal or conservative.
On Monday, January 22, none of the networks sent a Washington reporter a few blocks down to the March for Life. CBS and NBC offered brief anchor snippets noting "both sides" of the abortion debate would protest on the anniversary of the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision, ignoring that one side brings tens of thousands to Washington, and the other side numbers in the tens. ABC did nothing.
But over the weekend, the Big Three networks were much more eager to publicize tens of thousands of protesters in Washington just six days later for a different cause: against the war in Iraq and in favor of the impeachment of President Bush. The Big Three networks offered five full reports and six anchor briefs on the Bush-bashing rally. So the contrast in stories was 11 to 2, or if you only count full stories instead of anchor briefs, the contrast was 5 to 0.
That's not counting mentions of the leftist protests on the Sunday morning talk shows (one on CBS, one on NBC), including Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer extravagantly raising the anti-war march numbers to "hundreds of thousands," far above other national media estimates.
- ABC made no mention of the March for Life. Its only mention of abortion on January 22 came in a Good Morning America interview with author and Supreme Court reporter Jan Crawford Greenburg, who said the current court is more likely to let states restrict abortion.
But ABC aired two stories and an anchor brief on the anti-war protest. ABC offered a sympathetic story on Saturday's Good Morning America, with Laura Marquez reporting how 12-year-old Moriah Vanderwerf would speak. Saturday night's story on World News was welcomed with the on-screen graphic "Peace Surge" as protesters focused on "the steady drumbeat of death." Anchor Bill Weir introduced the story referring to protesters who are "newly energized in their struggle to end the war." Sunday's Good Morning America added an anchor brief.
- CBS aired one anchor brief on abortion protests on the January 22 Early Show. Anchor Russ Mitchell noted: "Today is the 34th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision. Both sides in the abortion rights battle will demonstrate in Washington. Opponents will stage a March for Life while abortion rights supporters will hold a vigil at the Supreme Court."
By contrast, the anti-Bush march drew three stories and two anchor briefs. Reporter Joie Chen had two Saturday Early Show reports and one for the Saturday Evening News. She did report organizers were aiming their protest at the Democrats, but her evening story highlighted an anti-war military family she said could "provide political cover" for Democrats.

- NBC morning anchor Ann Curry also quickly handled the abortion-protest story on Monday: "People on both sides of the abortion issue are holding rallies today in Washington. Today is the 34th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision that made abortions legal."
NBC devoted two morning anchor briefs and an evening news story to "peace." On the morning of the anti-Bush rally, Today anchor Allison Stewart touted "thousands of anti-war protesters will gather today for what organizers predict will be one of the largest demonstrations since the war began in 2003." On NBC Nightly News, reporter John Yang touted the rally and a new Newsweek poll showing "67 percent of Americans now say the President's Iraq policy is based on his personal beliefs regardless of facts." So is the media coverage of protests.
SHARE THIS STORY:
E-mail
Print
Newsvine
Digg
Reddit
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Latest Headlines
- McCain Stresses Role as Maverick, War Vet, Makes Bipartisan Appeal in Acceptance Speech

- Foiled Again - Attempt to Paint Palin as Slashing Funds to Teen Moms Proven False

- EU Seeks Legal Means to Shut Up Eurosceptic Bloggers

- Comments on September 5, 2008 News

- Sarah Palin News Highlights 2

- Speaker Pelosi "in Opposition" to Church Teaching on Abortion: San Francisco Archbishop

- CRTC Nixes Christian Radio Proposals, Supports Porn TV

- BC Court Ruling Means only Pro-Abortion Information is Allowed Inside Bubble Zones

- One Month Till 16th Annual Catholic Week of Prayer and Fasting for Life - October 5-13, 2008

- "Anti-Catholic" Union Advocating Homosexual Agenda May Face Human Rights Commission

- Brazilian Health Minister Gives False Testimony in Eugenic Abortion Case

- U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Launches New Stem Cell Research and Anti-Abortion Ads

- N. Ireland Pro-life Group launches 40 Days of Prayer and Fasting to Stop Abortion Threat

- Ottawa Gears Up for 40 Days for Life Rally

Most Read this Week
- USCCB Delivers One Last Blow to "Catholic" Pelosi on Abortion Remarks
- Exclusive: Sources Reveal Internal Uproar over Vatican Conference Promoting Organ Donation
- Lawsuit: Young Pro-lifers Jailed, Shackled, Strip Searched for Peacefully Sharing Message
- British Government Chooses Hitler-Loving Abortion Movement Pioneer for Stamps
- Prominent Psychiatrist: "No Particular Need for Sex-Education"
- Sarah Palin Delivers Gutsy Acceptance Speech
- Obama Launches Ad Campaign Attacking McCain for Pro-Life Policy
- Foiled Again - Attempt to Paint Palin as Slashing Funds to Teen Moms Proven False
- Potential Vice-President of the United States of America - Who is Sarah Palin?
- Scotland Bishops Oppose "Sexual Orientation Discrimination" Bill
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


Back to Top