Tuesday July 3, 2007


Applicant Fails Mass. Bar Exam After Refusing to Answer Homosexual "Marriage" Question
Sues Bar Examiners, Supreme Judicial Court
By John Jalsevac
BOSTON, Massachusetts, July 3, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A man who was given a failing grade on the Massachusetts bar exam has filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief and damages and is demanding a jury trial, claiming that he failed the exam after refusing to answer an inappropriate question on homosexual marriage.
Besides requesting that bar examiners do not consider the offending question when grading his exam, however, Dunne is also challenging the very constitutionality of the homosexual "marriage" laws in the state of Massachusetts. In the list of defendants Dunne includes the Supreme Judicial Court and the individual Justices.
In his complaint Dunne states "that Supporters of homosexual marriage have successfully legislated morality through the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court," and "that this act is an unconstitutional violation of the Massachusetts Constitution by the Massachusetts Supreme Court."
Dunne scored 268.866 on the bar exam, just short of the passing score of 270. A simple pass is all that is required on very demanding bar exams which are the last step to becoming a practicing lawyer in a state.
According to Dunne's complaint, filed on June 25, the "Defendants" (the Massachusetts Board of Examiners et al.) "have engaged in constitutionally invidious discrimination by including an inappropriate question on the Massachusetts Bar Examination compelling Plaintiff (Dunne) to write an affirmative response explicitly and implicitly accepting, supporting and promoting homosexual marriage & homosexual parenting…as a prerequisite to the practice of law in the State of Massachusetts."
Brian Rooney, a lawyer and the spokesman for the Thomas More law center, a not-for-profit public interest law firm dedicated to the defense and promotion of the religious freedom of Christians, has analyzed the pertinent documents about Dunne's case. He told LifeSiteNews.com, "It's a troubling development that a question like this would even be asked. It raises the specter that homosexuality and the homosexual agenda and the lifestyle is becoming the sacred ring that it seems that everyone in the state of Massachussetts would have to kiss in order to be deemed acceptable to do anything in the state, whether to practice law, to practice medicine, to become a politician."
Although in Dunne's filed complaint he does not specify which question on the exam he refused to answer, presumably the question that is the subject of Dunne's complaint is question #4 on the March 1, 2007 Massachusetts bar exam. That question asks examinees to analyze certain legal question surrounding the divorce of a lesbian couple, Mary and Jane.
"Yesterday Jane got drunk and hit Mary with a baseball bat, breaking Mary's leg, when she learned that Mary was having an affair with Lisa," reads the conclusion of the question. "As a result, Mary decided to end her marriage with Jane…What are the rights of Mary and Jane?"
While Rooney said that ultimately he could not say whether Dunne should or should not have answered the question, he said the nature of the question is so "charged" and "distracting" that it should never have been included on the bar exam.
"The whole workup to taking a bar exam is months of studying and preparation, not to mention three years of law school," said Rooney. "You work yourself up. You take that three years of law school, you cram it into 2 ½ months, trying to learn every aspect of the law that could potentially be tested. You get into the 2 days of testing. You're tested for 8-10 hours each day. As the spokesman for the Thomas More law center, it's very troubling to have such a politically charged question on the bar exam that is supposed to be testing your knowledge of the law and how it is to be employed, and they throw in this obvious political question that got Mr. Dunne to be distracted. It would have distracted me, or anyone of faith that believes homosexuality is immoral."
William F. Kennedy, the chairman of the Massachusetts Board of Bar Examiners, which administers the test, would not comment on the case, reports The National Law Journal. "The complaint is being reviewed," he said. "We have no comment at this time."
See the bar exam question on pg. 4 of the following document:
http://www.mass.gov/bbe/essayquestionsfeb2007.pdf
Read Stephen Dunne's complaint:
http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/upload/2007/07/dunne.pdf
SHARE THIS STORY:
E-mail
Print
Newsvine
Digg
Reddit
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Golden Arches Awash in Rainbow Colors: Family Group Boycotts McDonalds for Support for Homosexual Agenda

- President Bush and Senator McCain Address National Right to Life Conference

- Formal Request Filed to Terminate Morgentaler's Appointment to the Order of Canada

- Order of Canada Members Return their Awards Over Morgentaler Decision

- Abortionists in South Dakota Now Required to Admit Abortion Kills a "Whole, Separate, Unique, Living Human Being"

- Morgentaler Order of Canada Protest Set for July 9 in Ottawa

- LifeSiteNews Now on Facebook - Join Our Group, Spread the Word

- Comments on July 3 News

- Britain's Pathway to Euthanasia - NHS Protocols for Dehydrating Disabled Patients to Death

- Online Polls Show Strong Opposition to Morgentaler Order of Canada

- Canadian Cabinet Minister Kenney "Deeply Disturbed" that Abortion Doc Awarded Order of Canada

- More Prominent Pro-Life Groups Join Those who Oppose Morgentaler's Order of Canada

- Amnesty International Pushes Mexican High Court to Uphold Legal Abortion

Most Read this Week
- Cover of Maclean's Magazine Notes Children as Young as 8 View Online Porn Regularly
- Archbishop Calls All Catholics to Demand National Award to Abortion Doc be Revoked
- Pro-Life Groups Horrified by Morgentaler's Appointment to the Order of Canada
- Interview with World's Leading Proponent of Natural Family Planning on the Dangers of Contraception
- Pro-Life Group Appalled that Abortionist Morgentaler Would Even be Considered for Order of Canada
- Online Polls Ask Whether Morgentaler Should Have Been Awarded Order of Canada
- Interview – Philadelphia Cardinal Rigali: The Church Will Never Justify Homosexual Conduct
- Confirmed: Advisory Council Has Voted to Award Order of Canada to Abortionist Henry Morgentaler
- New Ad Takes Obama to Task for His Abortion Record
- Numerous MPs Condemn Morgentaler Order of Canada Decision
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any Internet re-publishing of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews that have come from other news sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


Back to Top