Friday September 28, 2007


Connecticut Bishops Allow Plan B in Catholic Hospitals for Rape - Catholic Medical Association Opposed
Vatican stated in 2000 "the absolute unlawfulness of abortifacient procedures also applies to distributing, prescribing and taking the morning-after pill"
By John-Henry Westen
HARTFORD, September 28, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A statement issued by the Connecticut Catholic Bishops yesterday, which is posted on the Catholic Conference's web page, notes that the Bishops have approved the administration of the morning after pill Plan B for rape victims at the four Catholic hospitals in the state. While the Bishops claim to be in accord with Church teaching on the matter, the only statement from the Vatican on the measure opposed it since the pill can cause abortions.
"In accordance with Catholic moral teaching, these hospitals provide emergency contraception after appropriate testing," says the letter from the Bishops. "Catholic moral teaching is adamantly opposed to abortion, but not to emergency contraception for victims of rape," it adds.
However, the Vatican statement on the morning after pill, issued in 2000, condemns its use outright. The Pontifical Academy for Life states that "the absolute unlawfulness of abortifacient procedures also applies to distributing, prescribing and taking the morning-after pill. All who, whether sharing the intention or not, directly co-operate with this procedure are also morally responsible for it." (see the full Vatican statement here: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdli...
The morning after pill works in three ways: To slow motility of the sperm, to inhibit ovulation and to prevent implantation of the embryo. The Vatican document stated: "It is clear, therefore, that the proven 'anti-implantation' action of the morning-after pill is really nothing other than a chemically induced abortion. It is neither intellectually consistent nor scientifically justifiable to say that we are not dealing with the same thing."
The bishops of Connecticut suggest that the administration of a pregnancy test prior to administration of Plan B puts sufficient doubt into the question of whether or not the abortifacient effect of the pill will be engaged. "The administration of Plan B pills in this instance cannot be judged to be the commission of an abortion because of such doubt about how Plan B pills and similar drugs work and because of the current impossibility of knowing from the ovulation test whether a new life is present," says the Bishops' letter. "To administer Plan B pills without an ovulation test is not an intrinsically evil act."
Scientifically however the Bishops are on very weak ground. The Catholic Medical Association, the largest professional organization of Catholic physicians in the U.S., is resolutely opposed to the use of the abortifacient morning after pill in Catholic Hospitals even in cases of rape because of its potential to cause abortions. Medical evidence demonstrates that the pregnancy tests used cannot accurately detect a pregnancy at fertilization but only after implantation which takes more than a week after the new life is formed.
At its Annual Meeting in 2003, the Catholic Medical Association passed a resolution correcting theologians who have erroneously suggested that it would be legitimate for Catholic hospitals to provide "emergency contraception" to rape victims. Echoing the Vatican, the resolution stated that that the morning after pill "cannot be ethically employed by a Catholic physician or administered in a Catholic Hospital in cases of rape".
The Connecticut bishops are not the only ones who have approved the use of the morning after pill in Catholic hospitals for rape victims. LifeSiteNews.com has learned that some Catholic hospitals in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Colorado, New York, California and Washington also offer so-called 'emergency contraception' to some rape victims with the approval of local Catholic bishops.
The bishops are basing their decisions on an interpretation of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops document: Ethical and Religious Directives (E.R.D.) for Catholic Health Care Services which states at no. 36 with regard to a woman who has been raped: "If after appropriate testing,, there is no evidence that conception has occurred already, she may be treated with medications that would prevent ovulation, sperm capacitation the process by which spermatozoa in the ampullary portion of a uterine tube become capable of going through the acrosome reaction and fertilizing an oocyte." However, the document adds: "It is not permissible, however, to initiate or to recommend treatments that have as their purpose or direct effect the removal, destruction, or interference with the implantation of a fertilized ovum." (see the document: http://www.usccb.org/bishops/directives.shtml )
However, even if such tests could accurately determine that ovulation has not yet occurred another difficulty exists. A study by Dr. Chris Kahlenborn in 2003 found that the pill only works to halt ovulation half the time. Thus fertilization may occur even after the pill is administered, and an abortion would result since in addition to stopping ovulation the pills act to weaken the lining of the uterus making implantation unsustainable. See Dr. Kahlenborn's study here: http://www.polycarp.org/postfertilization_polycarp_1.htm
Speaking with LifeSiteNews.com earlier this year, about the problem of bishops permitting the morning after pill in Catholic hospitals in cases of rape, Dr. Kahlenborn said bluntly, "The bishops who approve this are approving potential abortions."
See the full Connecticut Bishops' statement:
http://www.connecticut.nasccd.org/bins/connecticut/templates...
To express concerns to the Vatican:
Pontifical Academy for Life:
pav@acdlife.va
To email the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith:
Cardinal William Levada
E-mail: cdf@cfaith.va
SHARE THIS STORY:
E-mail
Print
Newsvine
Digg
Reddit
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Study Finds Common Infertility Treatments Are Unlikely To Improve Fertility

- Morgentaler Granted Legal "Standing" to Pursue Lawsuit against New Brunswick

- HLI Condemns Death Threats against Church and Affiliate in Ecuador

- Two Years and $100,000 Later: Ezra Levant Complaint Dismissed by Human Rights Commission

- Quebec Mayor Vows to Continue City Hall Prayer Despite Legal Threats

- Canadian Crossroads Walkers Kick off Trek from Toronto to Ottawa

- BC Government Moves toward All-Day Kindergarten for 3-5 Year-Olds

- Nude Dance at Club by Underage Girl ruled "Artistic" 1st Amendment Expression

- Study Confirms Abortion Increases Risk of Depression

- Canada's Abortion Militants Reiterate Condemnation of Unborn Victims of Crime Bill

- KofC Convention Adopts Resolutions Challenging Catholic Politicians on Abortion, Marriage

- Abortion, Condoms Heavily Emphasized at UN AIDS Conference in Mexico City

- Obama Promises "Change" for America One Homosexual Adoption at a Time

- Supreme Knight of Columbus Calls for Real "Change" on Abortion and Catholic Revolt against Obama Nation

Most Read this Week
- House Speaker Pelosi Vows to Kill Defense of Marriage Act and Still Receive Communion
- Nude Dance at Club by Underage Girl ruled "Artistic" 1st Amendment Expression
- Death Threats Received by Archbishop and Human Life International Leader in Ecuador for Opposing "Abortionist" Constitution
- Radio Hall of Fame will not Bow to Homosexual Pressure to Dump Dobson
- D.C. State Board of Education Approves New Restrictive Homeschool Regulations
- Foremost UK Gay Activist Admits there is No Gay Gene
- Uganda First Lady Decries Increase in Risky Sexual Behavior while West Threatens Pulling Funding over Ugandan "Homophobia"
- Immodest Dress in the Church: Like Frogs in Boiling Water
- Chaos at Canterbury: Rowan Williams has "Betrayed" Conservatives
- Reality Says Cohabitation a Disaster for Marriage but Poll Shows Public Believes Otherwise
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


Back to Top